Every thing that
would promote
progress must reckon
with education. The
reason for this is
that education is
the fundamental
thing in all
progress. Humboldt
says,'' The finest
fruit earth holds up
to its Maker is man.
To educate man is
the first duty.
Trade, law, science
and religion are
only the scaffolding
where- with to build
man."
The fundamental
forces of social
life may be reduced
to four. They are
religion,
government, industry
and education. The
solution of the
social problem
depends upon the
formal adjustment of
these forces. The
difficulty of
harmonizing them is
due, in great art,
to hereditary
conflict. Government
has been jealous of
religion because the
church as often
usurped the alleged
functions of the
state. Religion has
hated government
because the state
has often usurped
the alleged
functions of the
church. Industry has
hated both because
the shop and the
market have been but
the slaves of the
church and the
capitol. Education,
whose mission it is
to harmonize all of
these forces for the
perfection of the
race, has languished
because the school
has in all ages been
made not simply the
"hand-maid," but the
liveried flunkey or
the peripatetic
policeman of the
church and the
capitol, and, in
more recent times,
of the market.
With this heritage
of worse than
Highland feud to
deal with what hope
is there of harmony
?
The chief hope is
found in the fact
that industry is
asserting its
supremacy ; that
doing is taking
precedence of both
praying and ruling.
The doer at last
comes to his own.
The market is today
supreme. The church
and the capitol are
chained to its
chariot. The school,
enjoying somewhat
more freedom, is
still but a
contraband of war,
snatched from the
church and the
capitol and set,
like Vulcan, to
forging and riveting
bonds for the new
slavery instituted
by the market. To
change the figure
for greater
clearness, yonder
towers the market
mounted with a
Maxim. Its right
wing is the capitol
mounted with a flag.
Its left wing is the
church mounted with
a cross. In the rear
rise the
smoke-piercing
chimneys of the
factory. Yonder on
the heights,
overlooking all, and
growing yearly in
splendor of
equipment by
appropriations from
the market, frowns
the school. Why is
the school there?
Because each
generation must be
taught to protect
the market and its
adjuncts in its
present status or it
can not stand.
If education, as
represented by the
school, thus
commands the
situation for the
maintenance of the
present order, why
may it not, without
change of position,
be made to command
the situation for a
new order ? It has
only to train its
guns upon the market
instead of upon the
factory to remove
forever the Maxim
which crowns it and
to call industry, as
represented in the
factory into the
market and its
wings, and to place
over all in the
place where the
Maxim rested the
flag and the cross,
making Government
spell equality,
religion,
brotherhood and
industry
development. Then
may it vacate the
fort on the heights,
and with the
capitol, the church,
the market and the
factory, lose its
identity in the
harmonized life of
the world. Then may
it appear that there
never was any real
conflict between
religion and
government, or
between either of
these and industry,
but only between the
selfish, ambitious
mechanism
misrepresenting
these forces.
But to do this the
school, if possible,
must demonstrate
within itself the
essential unity of
these things. Is
this possible? The
question can be
answered better by
action than by
argument.
Let organized labor
make its demand that
the school, from the
kindergarten to the
university, shall
cease to be a mere
police force for
protection of the
"vested interests ''
of the few, and that
it shall become the
means for the
development of all
that is best in the
life of all. Then
may it come to pass
that religion, in
its social aspect,
will be but the
correction of
government. That
government will be
but the direction of
industry. That
industry will be but
the perfection of
education, or the
highest development
and expression of
the life of all.